Science and Islam are intimately linked. Islam not only places a
high premium on science but positively encourages the pursuit of
science. Indeed, Islam considers science as an essential
prerequisite for human survival.
This sounds odd. We normally think of religion as inimically
hostile to science. Wasn't there a long and protracted war between
science and Christianity? Did the Church not prosecute Galileo? But
this 'war' between 'science' and 'religion' was purely a western
affair. There is no counterpart of such mutual hostilities in
Islam.
On the contrary, Islam encouraged the pursuit of scientific
knowledge right from its inception. The Prophet Muhammad - who
himself could not read or write - emphasised that the material
world can only be understood through scientific inquiry. Islamic
culture, he insisted, was a knowledge based culture. He valued
science over extensive worship and declared: 'An hour's study of
nature is better than a year's prayer'. This is why he directed his
followers to 'listen to the words of the scientist and instil unto
others the lessons of science' and 'go even as far as China in the
quest of knowledge'.
The Quran, which the Muslims believe to be the very Word of God
and clearly distinguish it from the words of Prophet Muhammad,
places immense emphasis on scientific knowledge. The first Quranic
word revealed to Muhammad is 'Read'. It refers, amongst other forms
of readings, to reading the 'signs of God' or the systematic study
of nature. It is a basic tenet of Muslim belief that the
material world is full of signs of God; and these signs can only be
deciphered through rational and objective inquiry. Almost one third
of the Quran is devoted to the praise of scientific knowledge,
objective inquiry and serious study of the material world. 'Acquire
the knowledge of all things', the Quran advises its readers; and
pray: 'God increase me in my knowledge'. One of the most frequently
cited verses of the Quran reads: "Surely in the heavens and
earth there are signs for the believers; and in your creation, and
the crawling things He scatters abroad, there are signs for a
people having sure faith, and in the alternation of night and day,
and the provision God sends down from heaven, and therewith revives
the earth after it is dead, and the turning about of the winds,
there are signs for a people who understand" (45:3-5).
So science and Islam are, and should be, natural bed fellows. It
was the religious impulse that propelled science in Muslim
civilisation during the classical period, from the eighth to the
fifteenth centuries. It is the neglect of science that has plunged
the contemporary Muslim world in poverty and underdevelopment. The
revival of Islam and the consequent emergence of a modern Islamic
culture require a serious infusion of the scientific spirit in
Muslim societies.
We can see a clear demonstration of the close relationship between
Islam and science in early Muslim history. The initial drive for
scientific knowledge was based on religious requirements. The need
for determining accurate time for daily prayers and the direction
of Mecca from anywhere in the Muslim world, establishing the
correct date for the start of the fasting month of Ramadan and the
demands of the lunar Islamic calendar (which required seeing the
new moon clearly) led to intense interest in celestial mechanics,
optical and atmospheric physics, and spherical trigonometry. Muslim
laws of inheritance led to the development of algebra. The
religious requirement of annual pilgrimage to Mecca generated
intense interest in geography, map making and navigational
tools.
Given the special emphasis Islam placed on learning and inquiry,
and the great responsibility that Muslim states took on themselves
to assist in this endeavour, it was natural for Muslims to
master ancient knowledge. At the instigation of power patrons,
teams of translators lovingly translated Greek thought and learning
into Arabic. But Muslims were not content with slavishly copying
Greek knowledge; they tried to assimilate their teachings and
applied their principles to their own problems, discovering new
principles and methods. Scholars such as al-Kindi, al-Farabi, ibn
Sina, ibn Tufayl and ibn Rushd subjected Greek philosophy to
detailed critical scrutiny.
At the same time, serious attention was given to the empirical
study of nature. Experimental science, as we understand it today,
began in Muslim civilisation. 'Scientific method' evolved out of
the work of such scientists as Jabir ibn Hayan, who laid the
foundations of chemistry in the late eighth century, and ibn
al-Haytham, who established optics as an experimental science in
the tenth century. From astronomy to zoology, there was hardly a
field of study that Muslim scientists did not pursue vigorously or
make an original contribution to. The nature and extent of this
scientific enterprise can be illustrated with four institutions
which are considered typical of 'the Golden Age of Islam':
scientific libraries, universities, hospitals and instruments for
scientific observation (particularly, astronomical instruments such
as celestial globes, astrolabes, sundials and observatories).
The most famous library was the 'House of Wisdom', founded in
Baghdad by the Abbasid Caliph al-Mamun, which played a decisive
role in spreading scientific knowledge throughout the Islamic
empire. In Spain, the library of Caliph Hakam II of Cordoba had a
stock of 400,000 volumes. Similar libraries existed from Cairo and
Damascus to as far off as Samarkand and Bukhara. The first
university in the world was established at the Al-Azhar mosque in
Cairo in 970. It was followed by a host of other universities in
such cities as Fez and Timbuktu. Like universities, hospitals -
where treatment was mostly provided free of charge - too were
institutions for training and theoretical and empirical research.
The Abodi hospital in Baghdad and the Kabir an-Nuri hospital in
Damascus acquired world-wide reputations for their research output.
Doctors were entirely free to experiment and prescribe new drugs
and treatment; and wrote up their experiments in special reports
which were available for public scrutiny. Many basic surgical
instruments used today were first developed by Muslim doctors.
Similarly, there were a string of observatories dotted throughout
the Muslim world; the most influential one was established by the
celebrated astronomer Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, who developed the 'Tusi
couple' which helped Copernicus to formulate his theory, at Maragha
in Azerbaijan.
All this is, of course, in stark contrast to the situation of
science and technology in the Muslim world today. Apart from the
notable exception of Abdus Salam, the Pakistani Noble Laureate,
Muslim societies have hardly produced scientists of international
repute. Scientific research has a very low priority in most Muslim
states. Whatever happened to what the historian of science, George
Sarton described as 'the miracle of Arab culture'? And what can be
done to reignite the flame of scientific spirit in Muslim
societies?
Numerous theories have been developed to explain the decline of
science in Muslim civilisation. Blame has been placed on Islamic
law, family relationships and lack of protestant ethics in Muslim
culture. Even Islam itself, seen as 'anti-progressive' and
'anti-science', has been blamed. None of these theories are
credible. The brutal fact is that Muslims, consciously and
deliberately, abandoned scientific inquiry in favour of religious
obscurantism and blind imitation.
The driving force behind the scientific spirit of Muslim
civilisation was the notion of ijtihad or systematic
original thinking, a fundamental component of the worldview of
Islam. The religious scholars, a dominant class in Muslim society,
feared that continuous and perpetual ijtihad would
undermine their power. They were also concerned that scientists and
philosophers had a higher prestige in society than religious
scholars. So they banded together and closed 'the gates of
ijtihad'; the way forward, they suggested, was
taqlid, or imitation of the thought and work of earlier
generations of scholars. Ostensibly, this was a religious move. But
given the fact that Islam is a highly integrated worldview, that in
Islam everything is connected to everything else, it had a
devastating impact on all forms of inquiry.
Contemporary Muslim societies have a deeply emotional attachment
to their scientific heritage. This attachment often becomes a
psychological complex that impedes an objective evaluation of
science in the Muslim world. To be faithful to their scientific
heritage, Muslims need to do much more than simply preserve the
ashes of its fire - they need to transmit its flame.
Just as the spirit of Islam in history was defined by its
scientific enterprise, so the future of Muslim societies is
dependent on their relationship with science and learning. The
Muslims need to make a conscious effort to reopen the gates of
ijtihad and return to systematic, original thinking. And
place science where it belongs: at the very centre of Islamic
culture.
As an initial step, Muslims need to realise that there are no
quick fixes in science. Science, and scientific spirit, cannot be
bought or transferred. It must emerge from within a society and
scientific activity must be made meaningful to the needs and
requirements of a people. There is no substitute for rolling one's
sleeves and going back to the laboratory. Only by touching and
transforming the lives of ordinary Muslims can science develop as a
thriving enterprise in Muslim cultures.